Subject	Wrong, All 90 2+0 bumper covers are the same part #.
Posted by	Fast300 on October 22, 2005 at 3:54 PM
	This message has been viewed 26 times.
In Reply To	In '90, the rear opening for an auto was diff than 5 SP/ posted by not-hrz on October 21, 2005 at 09:34 PM
Message	And ALL 2+2's bumper covers use the same part #. Also, on the muffelers, the 2+2's had the round shape the 2+0's had the oval, transmition was NEVER a factor in the shape.
Follow Ups	Is the TT rear bumper the same as the NA's? - nissan300 18:06:05 10/21/05 Same. (n/m) - 92naz32 18:09:43 10/21/05 I think so, but not 100% sure (n/m) - testingzwaters 18:09:46 10/21/05 It is, after being rear ended mine was replaced with a.... - 92naz32 18:14:38 10/21/05 Yes, but maybe you received a 2+2's bumper & then it's no. (n/m) - NAZTTy 18:22:54 10/21/05 2 seaters YES, but the 2+2 bumper is different. - YugoBernie (NoVA) 18:23:00 10/21/05 Showoff - I'm heading over to technical! :/ (n/m) - NAZTTy 18:25:28 10/21/05 How many dahm gigs of pics do you have? - Spddracer 20:10:59 10/21/05 if you pay close attention, you'll see he uses the same 5. - Zfreak(Dallas) 20:39:30 10/21/05 In '90, the rear opening for an auto was diff than 5 SP/ - not-hrz 21:34:53 10/21/05 Bridgestones? - Spddracer 21:41:07 10/21/05 My memory may be failing, but I'm pretty sure. I'm positive - not-hrz 21:49:36 10/21/05 Was your NA a 2+2? (n/m) - Fast300 15:56:37 10/22/05 No it was a 2 seater. (n/m) - not-hrz 20:17:26 10/22/05 Wrong, All 90 2+0 bumper covers are the same part #. - Fast300 15:54:42 10/22/05 No, you're wrong, I'll take some pics and show you the - not-hrz 20:21:53 10/22/05 False - the differece is 2+2 vs 2 seater. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 17:43:07 10/22/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.